Peer Review

JSKP implements an organized and thorough peer review procedure in order to verify that
every manuscript submitted is academically valid, credible, and meets the highest standards
of research integrity before it is accepted for publication. The peer review of the manuscript
is the most significant quality control mechanism in the process of academic publication and
is accomplished through the review of original manuscripts by qualified individuals prior to
being published.

Purpose of Peer Review

The peer-review process will be aimed at:
● Evaluate originality and value of the study.
● Improve the visibility of the work and scholarly precision using professional advice.
● Make sure that it is related to the themes and standards of the journal.
● Uphold professional and ethical uprightness.
● Help authors to make their work generally better.

Review Process

1. Initial Editorial Examination
After the submission has been received the editorial team goes through the manuscript and
checks on the basic formatting, originality and compliance with the scope of the journal.
2. Reviewer Assignment
Corresponding independent specialists in the matter of the subject are invited to check the
manuscript. The choice of the reviewers will be based on the education and experience in
research.
3. Detailed Evaluation
How the manuscript is critiqued regarding a host of issues such as:
● Impression of Innovation and Research.
● Data and procedures validity.
● Form, words, and style.
● Proper referencing and citation.
● Applied or theoretical delivery.
4. Author Revisions
By sharing their thoughts with the reviewers, writers may be forced to make certain changes
or rewrite some of the big things. This phase assists in cutting the paper into a sharper one,
raising its bar in the academic circles.
5. Final Editorial Decision
The editor will either accept, modify or reject the work according to the recommendations of
the reviewers as well as the amended submissions, and inform the author of the decision.

Review System Principles

At JSKP the system of peer-review is based on the following principles:
● Confidentiality: The information regarding the manuscripts and reviewers is very
confidential.
● Discrimination: There is even no discrimination in the reviews and self-interest.
● Positive Feedback: Critics are keen in making constructive and professional
remarks.
● Transparency and Integrity: Editorials are done based on academic merit alone.
● Timeliness: The journal is geared towards making sure that reasonable time is taken
to be able to have an effective publication.
This stringent procedure of peer review enables JSKP to ensure that every one of the
published articles meets the established standards of known academic standards and the
contribution it makes to the body of knowledge and the profession practiced.